17 Overview: HyFlex Technology and Frameworks

I. The Empowered Educator and Liberated Learner Frameworks

The Empowered Educator Framework is a set of guiding principles and practices designed to assist educators in effectively integrating digital tools into their classrooms. It emphasizes the importance of technology literacy, effective communication, collaboration, critical thinking, and creativity in promoting student learning in the digital age. This framework can help educators create engaging and meaningful learning experiences that prepare students for success in an increasingly connected and complex world.

  • The Empowered Educator Framework aims to help educators be ready to teach in a digital age.
  • The Liberated Learner Framework[1] aims to help learners learn in the digital world.

The application of the two frameworks aimed at instructors and students helps improve digitizing the teaching-learning process. Let’s explore how the Empowered Educator Framework integrates technology tools to empower educators and enhance student learning:

  1. Choosing Educational Technology Tools:

When selecting technology tools, educators should consider three critical areas:

  1. Empowered Learners Initiative (ELi):
  2. Digital Fluency:

Remember, technology is a powerful tool when used purposefully and thoughtfully. By integrating it effectively, educators can create engaging learning experiences for their students! 🌟123

 

II. Technology Integration Models: TPACK and SAMR [2]

2.1 Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Model

TPACK (Mishra & Koehler, 2006) is a model for thinking about teaching through the instructor’s knowledge of the content (Content or CK), the ways they teach the content (Pedagogy or PK), and the technology tools (Technology or TK) they use to support the teaching.

Within the broad dashed circle of Contexts, TPACK is made up of three circles representing Pedagogical Knowledge (PK), Technological Knowledge (TK), and Content Knowledge (CK). These three circles have four overlapping areas, representing Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK), Technological, Content Knowledge (TCK), Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK).

2.2 Substitution, Augmentation, Modification and Redefinition (SAMR) Model

The SAMR model illustrates how technology can be integrated into a task with the intention of modifying learning by transforming from the lower levels to enhancing at the upper levels (Hamilton et. al, 2016).

Using the SAMR model does not require reaching the top level for every task. Each level has its own purpose and deciding which level to achieve depends on the learning outcome of the task and the reasons for integrating the technology.

The SAMR Model, developed by Dr. Ruben Puentedura, includes: the Substitution level, where technology acts as a direct substitute, with no functional change, the Augmentation level where technology acts as a direct substitute, with functional improvement, the modification level where technology allows for significant task redesign and the redefinition level where technology allows for the creation of new tasks, previously inconceivable. Substitution and Augmentation are Enhancement levels, and Modification

III. Rubric for selecting Active Learning Technology

Century College uses the Campus Academic Technology Team (CATT), a campus-wide subcommittee that receives nominations on technology tools that faculty select for their teaching and learning process. The CATT also reviews the technology tools with a customized rubric to recommend for adoption by the Information Technology Solutions (ITS) committee.

As the framework for evaluating technologies for active learning, two resources from Educause[3] serve as a good source to consult:

  1. The Learning Space Rating System (LSRS) addresses the needs of the physical space for active learning. The Learning Space Rating System (LSRS) project provides a set of measurable criteria to assess how well the design of classrooms supports and enables multiple modalities of learning and teaching, especially that of active learning. Please consult the FLEXspace[4] to help you plan, design, implement, maintain, assess, and improve your campus learning spaces.
  2. Rubric for Active Learning Technology Evaluation Please consult Educause’s sample rubric for technology evaluation. This Rubric-for-eLearning-Tool-Evaluation from Western University of Canada is also helpful

 


  1. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/learner/
  2. https://taylorinstitute.ucalgary.ca/resources/SAMR-TPACK#:~:text=Technology%2C%20Pedagogy%2C%20and%20Content%20Knowledge,to%20support%20how%20they%20teach.
  3. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2022/4/a-rubric-for-selecting-active-learning-technologies
  4. https://flexspace.org/about/

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Flexible (HyFlex) Design Copyright © by Genzeb Jan Terchino is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book