2. Strategies for Preventing Scarcity

As discussed in Chapter 2B, water storage supplied by dams plays an important role in combating water scarcity by storing surface water for major cities and agriculture worldwide. However, the negative impacts associated with dams means that few new dam construction projects are being proposed or approved, and many old dams are being decommissioned. Instead, alternative solutions are being implemented that provide more environmentally friendly solutions. These solutions focus around increasing the supply of water or using water more sustainably (i.e., decreasing water withdrawals).

2.1 Increase water supply

Sand Dams

Sand dams are only 2-4 meters tall and about 20 meters in length. Large dam projects are 15 meters or taller. The Hoover dam is 221 meters tall and 379 meters in length!

One method of increasing water availability in arid regions is by using sand dams. These are a rainwater (or snowmelt) harvesting technique in areas with sandy soil and ephemeral streams (streams that flow only briefly in localized areas following heavy rainfall or snowmelt). A small, reinforced concrete wall is built across an ephemeral stream channel and during heavy rainfall, water erodes the soil and surface runoff transports the soil into the stream channel. The sand settles behind the dam wall, but the silt and clay sized particles remain suspended and are transported with the water as it flows over the wall. Over time, sand deposits fill the space behind the dam until they are level with it. This can take anywhere from 1 rainy season to many years depending on erosion rates in the area. This built-up area of sand is the sand dam (Figure 2C.2.1). During rainfall and surface runoff events, water infiltrates into the sand dam to be stored in the pore space, where it can be used by local communities for domestic and agricultural purposes when it is dry. This also allows the water to infiltrate more easily and replenish deeper aquifers. Sand dams are a way of creating a thicker artificial surface aquifer to store water in dry regions. This helps protect water from evaporation, can improve local ecosystem health by supplying much needed water, and can improve local communities by increasing access to water and decreasing time needed to collect water from far away sources.

labeled cross section illustration describing how a sand dam works. The hard riverbed makes a base and a wall is built on this hard riverbed. As water flows it deposits the sand it is carrying behind the wall but the clays and silts stay suspended in the water and those flow over the wall with the water. Over time the sand builds up enough that it is the height of the wall. Water infiltrates into the sand and fills the pore space - this is a sand dam.
Figure 2C.2.1 Sand dams create storage areas for water in arid climates. Source: Lindsay Iredale (2024). CC BY-4.0

Sand dams are mainly utilized across large regions of Sub-Saharan Africa and India but there are some in the United States as well, mostly in the desert southwest. They are simple and low-cost structures that require minimal maintenance and can be built within a handful of months. This differs from large dam projects which are very expensive, require constant maintenance and take many years to build.

Groundwater Recharge Systems

Groundwater recharge systems are another method of artificially increasing water table elevations. This can be done by redirecting water through canals or ditches to land areas that have been set aside to be used as infiltration basins. These land areas are chosen such that they have adequate porosity and permeability to allow for easy infiltration of water. To recharge deeper aquifers, water can be injected deep into the subsurface through wells. This can be useful for capturing winter storm moisture and spring snowmelt (when agricultural need for water is low) and storing it for the growing season. These techniques are being used in San Joaquin Valley, California to combat the groundwater depletion occurring there due to intensive agriculture.

Rainwater Harvesting

A method that is particularly useful in urban areas is harvesting rainwater. This is done by collecting rainwater that runs off buildings and can be done on a small scale, such as having a rain barrel to collect runoff from a house roof to store and use as water for a lawn or garden, but can also be scaled up to very large collection systems that harvest rainwater runoff from large buildings or building complexes. Rainwater harvesting is useful in urban areas because buildings and concrete have greatly reduced the ability for water to infiltrate and recharge groundwater. Using collected rainwater can offset withdrawals from underground aquifers or surface water used in municipal water supply systems. The Velodrome constructed for the 2012 Summer Olympics in London utilized a rainwater collection system across half of its roof. This reduced the need for municipally supplied water by 40%!

Check your understanding: Sand dams

2.2 Decrease water withdrawals

Water sustainability means water is being used such that there is enough water to meet everyone’s needs without depleting the resource.

While there are many options for reducing residential and industrial water usage (high water efficiency appliances, shorter showers, xeriscaping, etc.), the largest consumptive use of water is agriculture, therefore focusing on decreasing agriculture usage has the largest impact to overall water sustainability.

Farmers have a variety of ways to use water more sustainably, three of which are discussed below: irrigation type, crop choice, and soil health. Irrigation type focuses on using water efficiently while the other two focus on the agricultural conditions that allow for less water to be needed.

Irrigation Type

There are many different types of irrigation systems that all distribute water to a field in slightly different ways and all have their pros and cons. Just like in garden or home landscaping where there are more and less efficient sprinklers, there are also more and less efficient large scale irrigation techniques. The three main irrigation types are: surface irrigation, sprinkler irrigation, and microirrigation.

Surface Irrigation

Surface irrigation, also called flood irrigation, is the least efficient manner of irrigation. Flood irrigation involves water being supplied by canals, or pipes to the field, then allowed to flood across the field, flowing and ponding among the crops (Figure 2C.2.2). Flood irrigation is a “low-tech” method that is simple with minimal operating costs and often uses less energy than other irrigation methods. However, as this technique requires fields to be fairly flat and smooth so water will flow across the field without collecting in small pockets, it requires a large amount of labor for initial set up, operation, and maintenance. This technique is useful for large agricultural fields and pastures that are relatively flat lying.

Photograph of flood irrigated wheat field. Field has small wheat plants with ground being completely ponded with water.
Figure 2C.2.2 Flood irrigated wheat field in Yuma, AZ. Source: USDA (2002). Public Domain. Found here.

As the name implies, this technique floods a field with water, applying far more water than is needed by the plant. Some of the water gets used by the plant, but substantial amounts also evaporate or infiltrate deep into the ground becoming groundwater, where it is out of reach of the plant’s roots. There is also a

Application efficiency is the percent of the applied irrigation water that is stored and accessible to plant roots.

lot of surface runoff with this method, which carries away both soil and nutrients leading to increased need for soil augmentation and creating water quality issues. Another problem with flood irrigation is that the water is not always applied evenly to all plants; some plants might get too much water while others get too little. In water stressed areas, this is a highly unsustainable method of irrigation, with application efficiencies ranging from 30% – 50%.

Sprinkler Irrigation

Sprinkler irrigation applies water to soil by spraying water through the air. Water is pressurized and delivered to the sprinkler system pressurized from a main pipe which is typically buried so as not to interfere with or be damaged by farming operations. This type of system is useful for large agricultural fields, pastures, orchards, and vegetables.

There are a variety of types of sprinkler irrigation systems, but the most common type across the U.S. is center pivot. It uses a central pipe that feeds the sprinklers which are set out across the field on wheels (Figure 2C.2.3, left). These slowly rotate around the central pipe making a large circular pattern of watered field. This system is responsible for the large circular farm fields seen as you fly over the country (Figure 2C.2.3, right).

Left: Photograph of a center pivot system in a farm field. There is a large central tower where the water is connected to a buried pipe. This central tower is connected to a single long line of sprinklers on wheels that spread out across the farm field. Right: aerial photograph of a many farm fields that show circular growing areas. The circular fields are created by the center pivot sprinkler system rotating and making a large circle around the main central point tower seen in the left photograph.
Figure 2C.2.3. Center pivot irrigation. Left: Center pivot system in Wisconsin with a central pivot point tower that is connected to the buried mainline pipe. Water is supplied from here to the pipes and sprinklers supported on wheeled towers that sweep in a circle around the main tower. Right: Satellite view of farm fields in Kansas. The circular fields are watered using a center pivot system. Source: Left: Wikiwear1 (2023). CC0. Found here. Right: NASA (2001). Public Domain. Found here.

Sprinkler irrigation requires higher up-front and operating costs than flood irrigation due to the purchase and maintenance of sprinkler systems and underground pipes. Maintenance involves cleaning sprinkler nozzles of built-up debris to keep them working properly and keeping pipes connected and leak free. There is also a moderate amount of labor involved to set the system up initially, but minimal day-to-day labor is required to keep the system working as it is often automated.

Sprinkler irrigation is often more efficient than surface irrigation because water application is more controlled; water is being directed down onto the plants not just flooding everywhere in a field. In hot and/or windy areas, however, sprinkler irrigation can have significant water losses due to evaporation and wind drift. Not all crops are suited to sprinkler irrigation as the spray can be quite powerful and may damage more delicate plants. Application efficiencies in sprinkler irrigation range from 75% – 85%.

Microirrigation

Microirrigation is a method of localized irrigation in which water is delivered at or near the roots of plants. Water is delivered directly to plants at low pressure and highly controlled quantities to minimize runoff and evaporation. The two forms of microirrigation are drip irrigation where water drips from emitters in plastic pipe or tape (Figure 2C.2.4, left), or microsprinkler irrigation where water bubbles or sprays from small emitters that only wet a portion of the soil surface (Figure 2C.2.4, right).
left: farm field with rows of crops. Each row of crops has a small pipe running down it with holes that allow water to drop out onto the ground right at the base of the plants. Right: close up picture of a single almond tree with a mini sprinkler at its base.
Figure 2C.2.4. Microirrigation. Left: Drip irrigation tubing of a sugar cane plantation in Thailand. Right: Microsprinkler irrigation of an almond orchard in California. Source: Left: water.alternatives. CC BY-2.0. Found here. Right: USDA. Public Domain. Found here.

Microirrigation systems are used for many crop types. Drip irrigation is useful for field crops, fruits, and vegetables planted in long rows. Microsprinklers are popular for permanently installed systems that target individual plants such as in vineyards and orchards and useful for delicate fruits and vegetables as the low pressure will not cause damage. These systems are typically automated so that water is applied frequently (e.g., daily or multiple times per day) to maintain soil moisture. This promotes plant health by preventing overwatering or drying out between watering. Because water is applied directly to the crop plants, it also reduces weed growth which can compete with crops for water and soil nutrients.

The upfront costs of installing a microirrigation system are high because of the large amount of tubing and spray emitters required. Like sprinkler irrigation, there are also regular maintenance costs associated with keeping tubing and spray emitters clean and unplugged and keeping pipes connected and leak free, but the day-to-day labor required is low as these systems are typically automated.

While the upfront costs of this irrigation type are the highest of any type, they are the most highly efficient way to use water, which means less water is needed to get the same crop yield from a field. This means long-term savings in water costs that can make up for the high upfront costs. Application efficiencies for microirrigation range from 80% to over 95%.

The table below summarizes costs, labor requirements, and application efficiency of the three irrigation types.

Surface irrigation: Setup costs are moderate, operation and maintenance costs are low, labor requirements are high, application efficiency is 30% to 50%. Sprinkler irrigation: setup costs are high, operation and maintenance costs are moderate, labor requirements are low, and application efficiency is 75% to 85%. Micro-irrigation: setup costs are high, operation and maintenance costs are moderate, labor requirements are low, and application efficiency is 80% to over 95%.
Figure 2C.2.5. Summary of initial setup costs, operation and maintenance costs, labor requirements, and application efficiencies for the three irrigation types. Source: Adapted from USDA. Public Domain. Found here.

Check your understanding: Irrigation types

Crop Choice

As discussed in Chapter 2A.3, different crops have different water requirements so choosing to grow crops that have water requirements similar to the water amounts received from rainfall during the growing season can greatly impact how much irrigation water is needed. In terms of water sustainability, it is unsustainable to grow alfalfa, needing an average of 1200 mm of water, in an area that only receives 600 mm of water. It makes better water sense to grow a crop like wheat in this area that requires less than 600 mm of water on average. Of course, other factors would also need to be considered, such as the growing temperatures in the area, soil conditions, the amount of sunlight, length of the growing season, when in the growing season does the rainfall occur, etc., plus of course the economics of growing one crop type versus another. Comparing natural rainfall to crop needs and trying to match the two is a good first step towards water sustainability. 

Soil Health

Soil health is a major factor in improving water use efficiency in agriculture. Healthy soil can absorb and maintain moisture levels so less water needs to be applied through irrigation. Utilizing cover crops and conservation tillage practices can improve soil health.

Cover Crops

Cover crops are mixtures of crops like grasses, small grains, and legumes that are planted in and around the crop being sowed/harvested (Figure 2C.2.6). They cover the ground to prevent any open soil on a farm field, which helps prevent soil loss through runoff and keeps the soil cooler thereby reducing water lost to evaporation. The increased plant cover also decreases surface water runoff allowing more water to infiltrate into the root zones of the crops where it can be used. Cover crops also suppress weed growth which can compete for water and nutrients. As the cover drops die and decompose, this adds organic matter and nutrients to the soil and improves soil structure by creating more loose, open soil which absorbs and holds water more effectively. 

Photograph of two rows of tall corn stalks with a dense set of cover crop plants in the open space between the corn rows.
Figure 2C.2.6. Cover crops between rows of corn on a farm in Iowa. Cover crops are a mixture of radish, ryegrass, and clover. Source: NRCS/SWCS photo by Lynn Betts (2017). CC BY-2.0. Found here.

Certain cover crops also help bind nutrients back into the soil. Clover and legumes (like peas and beans) are particularly useful for this as they are “nitrogen fixers”. They bind nitrogen from the air and “fix” it into a form required for plant growth. Nitrogen is an essential component for growth and is one of the main components in commercial fertilizers. Using legumes as a cover crop can help reduce the need for fertilizer application.

Conservation Tillage

Conservation tillage practices are no-till or low-till practices where farm fields are not completely plowed up at the end of the growing season (Figure 2C.2.7). With conservation tillage there is minimal tilling that is confined to specific rows where planting will happen. This allows cover crop and other crop residues to stay on the surface and continue to protect the soil outside of the growing season reducing wind and water erosion of the soil. Like the practice of cover cropping, plants remain in place and roots break down adding nutrients and organic matter to the soil and improving soil structure, so soil better absorbs and holds water.

Young soybean plants are being planted in long rows and between the rows is the leftover residue and stalks from a prior wheat crop that has been left in place.
Figure 2C.2.7 Soybeans planted in rows among a residue of wheat crops in a no-till field. Source: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (2011). Public Domain. Found here.
Fields that use these methods have an increase in organic matter, higher infiltration rates of water, and a better ability to hold water than conventionally tilled fields. This means water applied to the fields stays in the field supplying plant roots instead of running off, allowing for fields to be irrigated less often and with less water.
As a bonus for farmers, conservation tillage saves both time and money. The reduction in labor costs from not tilling can save thousands of dollars per year, and a reduction from over 6 gallons of diesel fuel used per acre with conventional tilling practices down to less than 2 gallons of fuel per acre with conservation tilling practices can save more than $8,000 in diesel costs per year on a 1,000 acre farm. This is in addition to the water savings costs.
As a bonus for the planet, less diesel means decreased greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels and improved soil health allows soil to pull more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, which means this method helps combat climate change.

References

Bjorneberg, D. (n.d.). Some Information About Irrigation. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/20540000/k12/irrigation.htm#:~:text=Application%20efficiency%20can%20be%20greater,to%2050%25%20for%20surface%20irrigation.

Creech, E. (2017). Saving Money, Time and Soil: The Economics of No-Till Farming. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2017/11/30/saving-money-time-and-soil-economics-no-till-farming

Richardson, J., (2023). Large Scale and Commercial Rainwater Harvesting. The Renewable Energy Hub UK. https://www.renewableenergyhub.co.uk/main/rainwater-harvesting-information/large-scale-commercial-rainwater-harvesting

 

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Environmental Geology Copyright © 2024 by Lindsay Iredale is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book