"

Comparing Voices

Jody Ondich

Human vs. AI Voice

Learners use AI  to reflect on elements of writing that are unique to humans versus elements of writing that can be replicated by AI. This is one way to assist students in finding bias, inaccuracies, poor sources, and more when using AI to write their work.

Example: Replicating Writing

Goal

The goal of this Ethics assignment was to give students firsthand experience using AI, while also encouraging them to critically evaluate AI-generated content. In this unit, we were exploring the idea of absolute rules, so I asked students to consider whether any hard and fast guidelines should exist for college students using AI. I also wanted them to reflect on the kinds of editing, adaptation, or rewriting necessary to turn AI-generated text into a strong, usable piece of writing.

How It Was Done

The assignment:

“You are going to go to Copilot and interact with it. Copilot is an Artificial Intelligence created through Microsoft.  You already have access to Copilot as a Minnesota State college student. I am including a video to help you see how to use this tool, and how you will login. Here, then, is what you need to do once you get into Copilot:

  • Think of a question that you believe is an ethical dilemma–something of concern in our culture or in your life–that you would like to ask Artificial Intelligence (AI) to talk about.
  • In the discussion area, post the ethical dilemma question or concern that you come up with. Then go and pose your ethical dilemma question to Copilot, asking for a short essay on your topic.
  • When you have an answer from Copilot, post the response in the discussion area. What did it say in response to your ethical dilemma? Once you have done this, reflect on these questions in the discussion area, and respond to others after reading what they have produced  (the usual discussion requirements apply here):

Do you like what AI came up with in response to your question? Do you agree with its answer? Would you have phrased things the way it did?

Does using this AI for this assignment give you anything of value? If so, identify what that might be.  If not, tell us why not.

What ways can you see yourself using AI? Would it include college level work?  How?

Are there problems in looking to AI for answers, comments, or other materials for college assignments? Are there benefits?  What are these?

Would you use AI to write a college paper, or assist in this process, for you? What about having it write some of a paper? Would you just use it for research? Is it any better than, say, Google?

What would you need to do to make something AI generated fit to hand in?

What kinds of sources did Copilot indicate it had used  (it will list them below the answer it gives you)? What do you think of those sources?

Are there any rules you can think of that you would consider universal law concerning the ethical use of AI? (this is an ethics course–any absolute here?)”

Results

The students asked Copilot everything from “Can murder ever be justified?” to “How do we convince others about the realities of climate change?” to “You are an engineer designing self driving cars.  Should you program it to prioritize the safety of passengers or pedestrians?” to “Should we do medical testing on animals?”  They received many kinds of short responses, even after asking it for an essay, often in lists of short two-three sentence paragraphs, sometimes in “Pros and Cons” format, and sometimes as an actual essay. They did an excellent job in identifying a number of issues with the responses:

  • “It tends to use complex and sometimes too elaborate vocabulary.”
  • “It’s nice, but you still ultimately have to fact check.”
  • “Copilot likes Wikipedia.”
  • “This is a new technology, and I worry about becoming dependent on something that might not be accurate.”
  • “I found it concerning that it expressed opinions about my topic.”
  • “I would have to completely rewrite this, as it sounds nothing like me.”

They also identified a number of ways in which AI might be useful:

  • “I can see myself using this for creating an outline”
  • “This is a great brainstorming tool”
  • “It added ideas to some that I already had concerning this topic.”
  • “It found me a source I didn’t know about.”
  • “Asking it about words I didn’t know was time-consuming, but I learned something in the process.”

 

 

Considerations

Potential Issues

  • This is the kind of assignment that could be really useful in teaching students how to benefit from using AI.  It might also show them how to do less work on their own, however, and this is a concern.  But discussing the ethical use of AI in any college level course is likely to be important these days.  Not talking about it won’t help students understand what is expected of them in any particular course.
  • The vocabulary and sometimes the set up of anything AI generated is often what clues faculty in to the fact that a student didn’t write something. AI often uses advance vocabulary  (what 18 year old starts a paper out with the phrase “Heretofore, in the fragmented timeline…”) AI also can generate a interesting list of paragraphs in either a bulleted or a numbered list.  Often there are headings included. Students who are just generating something and turning it in without any editing or changes give themselves away because of these tendencies of AI.

Best Tools for the Job

  • Almost any word based  (not image based, like Dall-e) AI could work for this kind of assignment, but I insisted on the use of Copilot for this assignment because of our Minnesota State contract, as I wanted to have their data privacy protected.

About the author

Jody teaches philosophy at Lake Superior College in Duluth, and is part of a faculty development team there. Her focus areas are OER development, digital accessibility, AI use, and online course review programs. She has written 3 OER texts, housed at the University of Minnesota Open Textbook network.

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Comparing Voices Copyright © 2025 by Jody Ondich is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book