Introduction: the FLC Framework
The need for greater equity in higher education learning environments is abundantly clear, both nationally and in the state of Minnesota.[1] Yet many educators find themselves daunted by the enormity of the challenge. How exactly do we “do equity” in our classrooms, whether in person or online? While Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) trainings abound, it can be difficult to translate broad concepts into concrete applications and practices within our respective disciplines.
In this Faculty Learning Community, we bring together a community of peers within your discipline to help you develop “just one thing” you can bring into your teaching practices to enhance equity for your students. Research around culturally responsive teaching—one of many terms used to indicate equitable teaching practices—boils down to three key areas. There are many different frameworks that have been used to describe those areas (see Transactional Distance Theory,[2] Community of Inquiry,[3] and the Rigor/Relevance Framework,[4] among others), but for our community, we will use these terms:
- Relationships: creating trust and community, in a manner that ensures all students know they and their cultures are valued assets to a collaborative and safe learning environment
- Relevance: establishing the connection between the learning content and students’ daily lives, cultural practices, and aspirations
- Rigor: well-designed, disciplinarily-current, and learning-science-informed courses, instruction, and assessment
Starting from this framework, you will develop an Action Plan. Progressing alongside your colleagues and benefitting from their insights, you will move from identifying a goal, to choosing “just one thing” that you can do toward achieving that goal, to planning incremental and time-bound steps for implementation, to determining how you’ll evaluate the plan’s effectiveness. While achieving “just one thing” can make a significant difference for students, our hope is that this initial practice will also offer you insights into what works best—not just for your students, but also for you as you continue to bring future equitable teaching practices into your learning environments.
- Field, K. (2019). Minnesota has a persistent higher-ed gap: Are new efforts making a difference? The Hechinger Report. Retrieved online: https://hechingerreport.org/minnesota-has-a-persistent-higher-ed-gap-are-new-efforts-making-a-difference/ ↵
- Michael G. Moore, Editorial: Three Types of Interaction, 3 AM. J. DISTANCE EDUC. 1, 1 (1989) ↵
- Athabasca University, Mount Royal University, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, and the Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. (n.d.). Community of Inquiry: About the framework. The Community of Inquiry. Retrieved online: https://www.thecommunityofinquiry.org/framework ↵
- Jones, R.D. (2010). Rigor and relevance handbook. 2nd ed. The International Center for Leadership in Education, Inc. Retrieved online: https://www.in.gov/gwc/cte/files/ncteb-rigorrev.pdf ↵
Read more about what equity in higher education means: https://online.maryville.edu/blog/equity-in-higher-education/#:~:text=While%20equality%20means%20offering%20every,the%20disadvantages%20some%20students%20face.